Eu4 ideal army composition.

Active-Cow-8259. • 1 yr. ago. 1.35 doesnt really Change Combat as far as I know. If you dont know much about composition Here is the most important stuff. You should allways try to fill the combat with (cw) in the front row (infrantry + cavalery). The backrow is only used by the artillery, so artillery allways adds extra damage, however ...

Eu4 ideal army composition. Things To Know About Eu4 ideal army composition.

My understanding from what I remember is that your cavalry/infantry ratio effectively lets you have a certain number of cavalry attacking compared to your combat width, so if you have 12 combat width and 25% C:I ratio, you can have 4 cavalry dealing flanking damage. You get a unique Cossack Republic government type called "Sich Rada" which prioritizes cavalry. You basically start the game with +40% cavalry combat ability and you can stack even more in fairly short order. Here are some sources of cavalry combat ability: +20% Sich Rada government reform. +20% Cossacks estate. WeaponFocusFace. •. Before you have 100% cav to inf ratio, use primarily infantry with 4 cav for flanking like every other nation. Even when you get to 75% ratio, it's not a good idea to put that much cav into your armies, because your infantry gets put in the center of any battle you fight and therefore dies first and dies more than cav.Im currently playing as Russia and Im wondering how I should organize my massive military. I know of the spreadsheet except it recommends over 60 regiments per army, and most of my land can barely support 30. Should I keep that ratio and reduce...

Cavalry heavy armies are just a nightmare to micromanage and one of the things I wish Paradox would recode: As a novice at EU4, I loved playing Poland. I would go 10/10, or 12/8 infantry/cavlary armies and I would get shredded because my infantry died and then I took a huge tactics penalty because I had too much cavalry to infantry ratio.5. sacrich_cc. • 4 yr. ago. As everything with EU it's pretty complicated, here's a doc telling you the optimal comp for every tech. 3. BaronWalrus1. • 4 yr. ago. Build a combat width stack with 2 or 4 cavalry depending on your economy give it 3 artillery as well so you can barrage capital forts. The rest of your FL can be saved for ...If memory serves right, in 1650 your combat width should be around 32. So a good army composition might be 32 front row infantry + 8 spare units = 40 infantry and 21 artillery to get the maximum siege bonus on a star fort capital (level 6 + 1). You can go all the way up to 32 artillery, if you can afford that.

I've always wondered which composition of my army would be optimal. Most of the time I used 2:1:1 or 3:1:2, but have never been really certain if this was optimal. You surely know the wiki-charts showing how unit-pips increase for each tech-group and that there are several steps shifting the effectiveness of units from infantry to cavalry and back.

Duh. The US Army has concluded that Iran was the only victor of the eight-year US campaign to remove Iraqi president Saddam Hussein and replace him with a democratic regime. That’s...Army composition will change as technology changes, as combat width will be increased (base is 25) and unit strength will get shifted. Cavalry is the best at game start, but will lose its power/price ratio around mid game, so people use as many as their economy and tech group can afford (100% for nomad, 80% muslim, 60% eastern, and 50% rests) at the start, but only use 2~4 later for the extra ...It's not bad at all, you get -10% from Manchu traditions and -20% from Cossack estate. Hordes reinforce for free, so they don't have to pay extra to keep their numbers up during wars.Combat width is the maximum amount of units that can participate in one combat "row" at one time. So in your example of 24 combat width you can have 24 units in the front line and 24 units in the back line. The game will automatically fill your frontline with infantry and cavalry and your backline with artillery.What army composition is best depends entirely on the situation. Lategame is characterized by very long exhausting battles. While in early game armies are out of morale very quick and retreat without many losses, in late game they may fight until the last man. And regiments deal damage based on their size.

Go to eu4 r/eu4 • by ... Army composition . It's about 1508 and I'm a massive Venice. I have built to force limit, full drill, and first level army professionalism. My main armies (not the stacks of pure infantry that serves to resupply the front line) are mainly around 12-20 infantry with 3 Calvary and a full back line of artillery. One ...

The best army composition is infantry equal to combat width plus artillery equal to combat width. Cavarly don't actually do much more damage in most cases at most tech levels, so scrap them unless you're Poland or a horde. You can skip out on the artillery until mil tech 16 or so.

Overall, mercs, supply limit and cannon factor a lot more into army composition and management than the inf/cav split. Don't cheap out on cav, especially early. Do cheap out on cannon, especially early. If you're super dominant and just want to siege a bunch (like russia) then you can go for more cheap infantry. Oh, one more thing.Ideal army composition in 2023? ... Some franchises and games of note: Stellaris, Europa Universalis, Imperator: Rome, Crusader Kings, Hearts of Iron, Victoria and Cities: Skylines. Members Online. Mockup Political Map of Anataloia from Tinto Talks #4Horde idea, so you can hit 5 ducat cavalries, making your cavalries cheaper and hit harder than your infantries. Then only use cavalries at this point. This allows a much bigger skill cushion for the new horde players, as your armies hit harder causing more stack wipes and fewer casualties, and your economy can easily sustain your troops ...Thanks for the replies everyone. Can't say I'm certain what composition I'm more comfortable with. I liked the 3/1/2 because of the aforementioned carpet sieging as well as the plentiful number of infantry compared to cavalry; I tend to be quite paranoid about running the risk of having too few infantry to support my cavalry after particularly …Im currently playing as Russia and Im wondering how I should organize my massive military. I know of the spreadsheet except it recommends over 60 regiments per army, and most of my land can barely support 30. Should I keep that ratio and reduce...Best army composition assuming you have infinite money. Question I commonly read that ideal late game comps have 0 cavalry, but I don't really know if this is because they are more expensive or because they are actually worse than infantry. ... A place to share content, ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Europa Universalis ...

It depends a little on the situation, but I generally avoid fixed army compositions. For the most part, I will aim have about three siege-focused stacks with inf = art, the size of which is enough to siege a fort with a +5 bonus (11 in the early game), combined with a fourth field army that consists of infantry and twice flanking range of cavalry and in total has full …16/4/20. If I'm not mistaken, the optimal army composition consists of your combat width full of artillery, 40% of the width of cavalry and then 60% multiplied by 1.5 the width of infantry. So basically, if your combat width is 20, you should have 20 artillery, 8 cavalry and 18 infantry. 6:4 cav/artillery for Polish horde.There's lots of nuisance here so read the guide if you haven't already, but in summary here are his recommended choices (Western Tech Group): INFANTRY. Tech 0-4: Latin Medieval Infantry. Tech 5-8: Galloglaich Infantry. Tech 9-11: Condotta Infantry. Tech 12-14: Free Shooter Infantry. Tech 15-18: Maurician Infantry.Lately i've been using an army composition of 3-1-2 at the start of a war, but during a war i can't keep track of my armies and just recruit random…In EU4, army composition is crucial for achieving victory on the battlefield. In this guide, we will reveal the best army compositions for different stages of the game, from early to late game. Starting Army Composition (1444) Updating Army Composition with Increased Combat Width (Tech 5) Introducing Artillery (Tech 7)If you're at 63% Cavalry Combat Bonus that means that you're infantry has 20% Infantry Combat Bonus (Piechota Wybraniecka & Quality Ideas), what if I go half and half with a full combat width of Artillery. 63% Cavalry Combat Ability seems like it would chew through their flanks in no time. I use 8:8:8.Importance of Artillery. There's a couple of main factors in combat in Victoria II. First of all, artillery is very powerful in terms of damage, but is easier to kill than infantry. So you want as much artillery as possible in a stack, while having an equal number of units in the front line of battle so your artillery is not exposed.

When war comes you either join your trade fleet up with your war ships in order to battle enemy fleets, put trade fleets in port for safety or leave them be. It all depends on the war and what the threat is. But your goal should be in a naval war to destroy or trap the main enemy fleets (in addition to blockading ports) thus allowing your trade ...

Go to eu4 r/eu4 • by ... Question about army composition . I had the game for some time but i just recently started playing it as the ottomans (i know lot of people hate on the ottomans but i heard it's a good starting country) My military tech is level 5 and my combat width is 25. ... I think it was reman who said 4 cav is ideal, cause then ...Go to eu4 r/eu4 • by Enough_Fudge_2574. Army composition . It’s about 1508 and I’m a massive Venice. I have built to force limit, full drill, and first level army professionalism. My main armies (not the stacks of pure infantry that serves to resupply the front line) are mainly around 12-20 infantry with 3 Calvary and a full back line of ...The best army composition is 150% of your width as infantry, 100% of your combat width as artillery and up to 4 cavalry. ... So say your combat width is fifteen, your ideal army has 15 artillery, 22-23 infantry and 4 cavalry. Around 40k troops overall. ... ask questions and/or talk about the grand strategy game Europa Universalis IV by Paradox ...Go to eu4 r/eu4 • by ... In point of army composition nothing changed for years except maybe some special units but they are not very important. You can find tons of posts about army composition in this subreddit. Baseline is get as much artillery as you can afford and cav only if you are rich or a horde/PolandArmy composition meta/recommendations Meta Just finding out (the hard way) about how important army comp is. ... In general it seems like you have the right idea with the comp you are going for. At the start of the game armies will rely more on cav (around 4) because you may not be able to field a full combat width army and in this case ...the army composition depends on your tech level. early on you should go for ~60-70% inf + rest cavalry, as soon as you get cannons add ONE or TWO to the stack. start going towards your compositon after MIL 13 or so. (slowly, no need to reach that army composition before MIL 16 at least)There's more or less no reason to not just use all 1:1 cav/cannon armies unless the 100% ratio thing changes for some reason. The reason is money. Hordes are poor. As much cavalry as possible. Merc infantry to siege/fill out the ranks a bit. No costs for reinforcement means merc infantry is more worthwhile, unfortunately merc cavalry is still ...Matthew Flores. In EU4, army composition is crucial for achieving victory on the battlefield. In this guide, we will reveal the best army compositions for different …Go to eu4 r/eu4 • by ... Im currently playing as Germany and I just want to know what a good army composition would be. Its late game if anyone has a good composition that pairs well with Prussian ideas please share. Thanks! ... The combat width thing is really the ideal that I try for, but keeping it near that ratio based on supply is ...

Ideal army composition for every tech Mil tech Combat width Infantry Cavalry Cannons Total Comments 0 15 17 4 0 21 For the reasoning behind this, see Zwirbaum's great unit guide. 2 20 22 4 0 26 Or this video by darkfireslide 5 22 24 4 0 28 If you find yourself to be a horde you may want to ignore all this and go full cavalry; I'm not sure if ...

4. Hidious8911. • 4 yr. ago. There really isn't a point to cav late game. Their main advantage is flanking but infantry get enough flanking range at tech 23 to be sufficient. And while they do more damage, artillery replaces that role later and cav get shredded by artillery. So late game you just want infantry and cav. 2.

I was wondering if anyone knew what kind of army composition I should have as Muscovy. Ik now Russia. Have over 100 force limit but I don't feel like…A well-composed photograph is really a matter of opinion, but there are a few tricks that tend to result in better pictures. That's what we're going to take a look at today. A well...I've always wondered which composition of my army would be optimal. Most of the time I used 2:1:1 or 3:1:2, but have never been really certain if this was optimal. You surely know the wiki-charts showing how unit-pips increase for each tech-group and that there are several steps shifting the effectiveness of units from infantry to cavalry and back.Army composition? I have been playing for a little while now but recently i did a cusco run and got my balls twisted by the rebels and im wondering if it's because of my army template? I usually have 10/5/0 in the beginning of runs until i unlock artillary and i switch to 15/5/10 and the first idea tree i go for is usually offensive.For a standard nation without any special cavalry bonuses: Tech 1-16: 4 cavalry and the rest of combat width of infantry. Tech 7: add at least 1 cannon to the fighting stack, to get +1 at siege.A national modifier (like a government or idea slot) is a scope that can hold any number of modifiers. The only reason for the limitation is UI. Hahaha it costs points for no benefit save flavor. I think it gives a (very minor) benefit, in that female rulers and heirs would be able to be made into generals.Military units are the basic components of an army in Europa Universalis 4. They come in different types, such as infantry, cavalry, and artillery, and have different attributes and abilities. Learn how to choose, recruit, and upgrade your units to gain an edge in warfare.Army composition for every single country, with maybe like 3-5 exceptions, in the game is extremely simple: 1. Use your initial cav only till the first battle. Merge until you end up with 0. Never recruit more cavalry. 2. Always try to move with stacks of infantry equal to combat width. If combat width is 20, have a stack of 20 infantry.16/4/20. If I'm not mistaken, the optimal army composition consists of your combat width full of artillery, 40% of the width of cavalry and then 60% multiplied by 1.5 the width of infantry. So basically, if your combat width is 20, you should have 20 artillery, 8 cavalry and 18 infantry. 6:4 cav/artillery for Polish horde.

Make sure to fight on flat ground. Lacking arty was more impactful than fighting on rough terrain though. It really is that important to have arty. Anyone saying that you should run 100% CAV is implying that your frontline should consist only of CAV, backline still requires arty. Little_Elia.Been playing EU4 off and on for a number of years now, and for a while I've been running an army composition of having 4 cavalry for every stack I have (assuming I can afford them, ofc). I picked this up several years ago, don't remember from where/who, but I'm now questioning whether this is still effective.I tend to use a 10:4 ratio and then add more canons as time progresses, but since poland have good ideas i could see myself reach up to 8:4. 1. Share. Lopeyface. • 9 yr. ago. Your army comp should be pretty standard. I assume you'll Westernize at admin tech 10. CW of infantry, 2 cavalry, CW-2 artillery. I'm actually playing a Poland game ...However, if you want to optimize for combat strength, optimal army composition is always, i.e. from the start of the game, a full back row of artillery, as much cavalry as your ratio can afford and the rest infantry, obviously modified to account for any casualties. Before tech 13/16, however, such a composition is grossly cost-ineffective.Instagram:https://instagram. fuse box chevy cruzeredskin auto sales reviewsmarried at first sight season 13 johnnyhow much does philly phanatic make Early game (around tech 7 when you get artillery): 10-5-5. Mid game: 10-4-6. Late game: 10-2-10 (or my personal preference with a stack of 22: 12-2-10) So if you were able to afford having two armies of these ratios or have an one army that was doubled it would look like the following.... Early game. fuji dalton menudryden funeral home in heflin alabama Army composition for every single country, with maybe like 3-5 exceptions, in the game is extremely simple: 1. Use your initial cav only till the first battle. Merge until you end up with 0. Never recruit more cavalry. 2. Always try to move with stacks of infantry equal to combat width. If combat width is 20, have a stack of 20 infantry. smooth criminal astd I've always wondered which composition of my army would be optimal. Most of the time I used 2:1:1 or 3:1:2, but have never been really certain if this was optimal. You surely know the wiki-charts showing how unit-pips increase for each tech-group and that there are several steps shifting the effectiveness of units from infantry to cavalry and back.The "Ideal" army composistion late game is enough cannons to fill the back row, so whatever your combat width is. Then 6 or 4 calvary units for flanking attacks, then just infantry afterwards. For a 30 stack, I normally will run 16-4-10. Reply.